<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>daryldean.com &#187; Politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://daryldean.com/category/politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://daryldean.com</link>
	<description>A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject. - Winston Churchill</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 04:00:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>North Korea &#8211; Again.</title>
		<link>http://daryldean.com/2009/05/28/north-korea-again/</link>
		<comments>http://daryldean.com/2009/05/28/north-korea-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 14:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daryl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senseless Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear weapon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weapons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daryldean.com/?p=106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I'm beginning to think that this is all a big joke, and I'm really starting to think that the best approach to North Korea would be to ignore it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="size-full wp-image-107 alignright" title="Propaganda" src="http://daryldean.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/dprk_1.jpg" alt="Propaganda" width="410" height="303" />So North Korea (Chosun, DPRK, whatever) has tested another nuclear weapon.  Unlike the last test which was widely thought to have fizzled, this test appears to have been a success.  And, at about 20KT, comparable to the bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki a the close of WWII.</p>
<p><span id="more-106"></span>This does not, of course, mean that they have something that they can mount on a missile.  And from what we&#8217;ve seen, it&#8217;s not like they have a working long-range missile anyway.  By most accounts, it will take them at least a couple more tests to get to that point.</p>
<p>The Obama Administration has reacted the same way that previous ones have.  A warning of dire consequences and an attempt to restart talks.</p>
<p>DPRK has responded by declaring the 1953 truce to be void, and every time anyone says anything &#8211; seemingly anything at all &#8211; they call it an Act of War.</p>
<p>So where does this leave us?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m beginning to think that this is all a big joke, and I&#8217;m really starting to think that the best approach to North Korea would be to ignore it.  Completely.  Like so:</p>
<p>NK: &#8220;Hey, USA!  We&#8217;re going to test a nuke!&#8221;<br />
USA: (Yawn) &#8220;What&#8217;s on CBS?&#8221;<br />
NK: &#8220;Really, we&#8217;re going to test, and we&#8217;re restarting Yongbyon!&#8221;<br />
USA: &#8220;Oh look, Dave&#8217;s got Madonna on again &#8211; we can&#8217;t miss this.&#8221;<br />
NK: &#8220;Okay, we&#8217;re going to do it now!&#8221;<br />
USA: &#8220;click&#8230;.click&#8230;.&#8221;</p>
<p>And really, after that, who cares?  Why should we care <em>what</em> they do?</p>
<p>Here are a couple of reasons why we&#8217;re supposed to care:</p>
<ul>
<li>North Korea has enough arillery in range of Seoul to flatten the city in short order, and doing that would be a bad thing.</li>
<li>They have close to 1.2 Million-strong standing army, and everyone else that can carry a chopstick is said to be in reserve.  Basically, the country is a barracks.</li>
<li>They might have a nuke or two they could deliver on the back of a truck.</li>
<li>We&#8217;re scared of them.</li>
</ul>
<p>Seriously, I&#8217;m tired of it.  Tired of it, and I&#8217;m nobody.  I have no power, no armies at my command, and I&#8217;m 39 years old which means I don&#8217;t even remember the Korean War.  And I&#8217;m so tired of this crap.  It needs to end so the rest of us can get on with our lives.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m worried that Kim Jong Il is losing it.  Losing his grip on reality, and maybe losing his grip on his country.  It makes me want to tell a story.</p>
<p>Over the weekend I visited an old friend of mine for his 40th birthday party.  He held a poker game, $20 buyin, so we played.  I lost a couple hands on bad beats that could have gone the other way, and then I went <a href="http://dictionary.pokerzone.com/On+Tilt" target="_blank">on tilt</a>.  I went on tilt because I was frustrated and I wasn&#8217;t thinking clearly.  I already lost the game and it was going to take something big to get me back in it.  So, in for a penny &#8211; in for a pound.</p>
<p>And I think the DPRK is on tilt right now.  The thing that&#8217;s kept me believing that they&#8217;ve always been about bluster and brinksmanship &#8211; but not actual action &#8211; is that Kim Jong Il likes being alive.  He drinks Hennesy, like show tunes, writes his own plays and so forth.  He hasn&#8217;t been a man that you would think is just plain nuts.</p>
<p>But, with him havnig suffered a stroke and obviously looking very gaunt in recent pictures, I&#8217;m wondering if he&#8217;s still playing with a full deck.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s time to call the bluff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://daryldean.com/2009/05/28/north-korea-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is President Obama Infallible?</title>
		<link>http://daryldean.com/2009/04/18/is-president-obama-infallible/</link>
		<comments>http://daryldean.com/2009/04/18/is-president-obama-infallible/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 19:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daryl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Deep Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[co2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cuba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rail]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daryldean.com/?p=109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is as though America - with President Obama at the helm - is entering a new age of enlightenment.  Can you tell I'm excited?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_110" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 230px"><img class="size-full wp-image-110" src="http://daryldean.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/fairey_obama.jpg" alt="Hope by Shepard Fairey" width="220" height="320" /><p class="wp-caption-text">&quot;HOPE&quot; by Shepard Fairey</p></div>
<p>I read in the news today that the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has now decided that CO2 is a pollutant that needs to be regulated, and that they&#8217;re going to do just that.  It was only two years ago that Bush quashed a similar push.</p>
<p>This is only the latest in an absolute flurry of tectonic shifts away from the policies of the Bush Administration.  It seems that it&#8217;s almost every single day that some old policy is nullified, exposed or outright revoked.  It is as though America &#8211; with President Obama at the helm &#8211; is entering a new age of enlightenment.  Can you tell I&#8217;m excited?</p>
<p>Already this week he gave Cuba (and Cuban-Americans) something to cheer for, released Bush-era documents that justified torture &#8211; while rightly saying that those who followed the bad advice would not be prosecuted, and announced plans for a national high-speed rail network.  Today it&#8217;s CO2, and somewhere in there the First Family managed to get a new dog!</p>
<p>Add this onto everything he&#8217;s done since he took office, and if it wouldn&#8217;t kill me I swear my head would actually spin right off.</p>
<p>One thing I&#8217;ll remind you of, dear reader, is that I&#8217;m Canadian.  During the eight years of Bush &#8211; beginning, fittingly enough, with a stolen election &#8211; I had thought America was all puffed out.  An old power, past its prime, that would just have to learn to take a new place in the World.</p>
<p>Well, America will certainly take a new place in the World, but for sure it won&#8217;t be anything less.  President Barack Obama most definitely has what it takes to get it done, and I say good on him.  He is exactly what America needs to pull itself away from fear and xenophobia, and toward enlightenment and justice.</p>
<p>What is good for the USA is good for me, so I say GOBAMA, and GO the 21st Century Renaissance!</p>
<blockquote><p>Update:  <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/04/24/schneider.polls/index.html" target="_blank">CNN is saying</a> that President Obama may be the &#8220;<em>Superpresident</em>&#8220;, and I couldn&#8217;t agree more.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://daryldean.com/2009/04/18/is-president-obama-infallible/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michelle Obama: Proud.</title>
		<link>http://daryldean.com/2008/06/21/michelle-obama-proud/</link>
		<comments>http://daryldean.com/2008/06/21/michelle-obama-proud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 17:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daryl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daryldean.com/?p=70</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did anyone on the right stop to consider what might actually be going through her mind?  And what it means?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t believe how much of a dustup has ensued from the following &#8211; seemingly inocuous &#8211; quotation:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;For the first time in my adult life I am proud of my country because it feels like hope is finally making a comeback.&#8221; (<a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/19/cindy-mccain-michelle-obama-in-patriotism-flap/">CNN</a>)</p></blockquote>
<p>Regardless of your political affiliation, I don&#8217;t see how you could take this to mean that Mrs. Obama was ever anything but a proud American.</p>
<p>Did anyone on the right stop to consider what might actually be going through her mind?  And what it means?</p>
<p><span id="more-70"></span>I believe that what she meant to convey is that, just perhaps, on the momentous occasion of a black man &#8211; and the one she married &#8211; being put up as one of the major parties&#8217; nominees for president, that a wall has been knocked down.  An injustice corrected.</p>
<p>That, from today forward, the game has changed.  <em>40 acres and a mule be damned, we&#8217;re going for the big prize.</em></p>
<p>And also perhaps a bit of defiance, in that it doesn&#8217;t matter how many white racist bigots might still be out there and what they might think &#8211; because they, as of this moment, don&#8217;t matter a damn anymore.</p>
<p>The tide has finally turned, and the equation now works in favour of those so long oppressed and dispossessed.  It really is a new day.</p>
<p>Being Canadian, and &#8211; incidentally &#8211; white, you might expect that I have a different perspective on things.  Canada, as most of you should know, was the <em>destination</em> of the <a href="http://www.google.ca/url?sa=t&amp;ct=res&amp;cd=4&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.histori.ca%2Fminutes%2Fminute.do%3Fid%3D10166&amp;ei=ouZbSNeEOpmIsAPW9sz4Cw&amp;usg=AFQjCNH-bIh6RbFlb8DxhITbhxOztZarhw&amp;sig2=2b1K5ezyrzVv0b1Xcd75Qg">Underground Railroad</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://daryldean.com/2008/06/21/michelle-obama-proud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where is Our Say?</title>
		<link>http://daryldean.com/2008/06/14/our-say/</link>
		<comments>http://daryldean.com/2008/06/14/our-say/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 16:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daryl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Deep Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daryldean.com/2008/06/14/our-say/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Where is our say on copyright reform?  Are we all going to be criminals tomorrow?
Welcome to the 21st Century, bitches.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday a reprehensible piece of legislation was introduced in the Canadian House of Commons that stands to make millions of otherwise law-abiding Canadians criminals.  It also stands to expose those same millions to lawsuits that could ruin lives, careers and families for the simple crime of shifting songs from a lawfully purchased CD to a lawfully purchased iPod or other device or storage format.  Welcome to the 21st Century, bitches.</p>
<p>The Federal Minister of Industry, Jim Prentice, says &#8220;This bill reflects a win-win approach.&#8221;</p>
<p>Just who will be doing all the winning with this is pretty clear.  And it&#8217;s not me and you.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2008/06/12/tech-copyright.html" target="_blank">http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2008/06/12/tech-copyright.html</a></p>
<p><span id="more-68"></span>Bll C-61 has all the hallmarks of being written by lobbyists.  American lobbyists.  Through the&#8221;process&#8221; of writing this bill, <em>neither Industry Canada nor Mr. Prentice have held any public consultations or met with any Canadian industry groups that might be affected by this legislation</em>.  <em><strong>No public consultations at all.</strong></em>  At the same time, meetings with American industry lobbyists have been free-flowing.  Canadian associations and industry as well as legal experts have expressly requested meetings about this, and all have been denied.  Just what the hell is that about?  <em>Who do you work for, Jim Prentice?</em></p>
<p>Are we the 51st fucking state, already?  Does our government have to kowtow to everything that the US government &#8211; and US business &#8211; wants?  The only &#8220;Canadian&#8221; groups that support this &#8211; ACTRA and CRIA &#8211; are American puppets anyway.</p>
<p>And how is it that we keep coming back to this?  How is it that conservative governments in this country continually introduce &#8211; and ram through with some success &#8211; such unpopular pieces of legislation?  Think back to Free Trade, the GST,  Meech Lake&#8230;the list goes on&#8230;until we get to the current capstone of this rotting pile of faeces wesee labelled as copyright &#8220;reform&#8221;?</p>
<p>Seriously, the Liberal Sponsorship Scandal was a big deal, but when you stack that up against the towering pile of shit that has been forced upon us by our Conservative governments &#8230; the mind just boggles.</p>
<blockquote><p>To Mr. Prentice:  Any government that passes legislation that changes the status quo so starkly and revokes hard-won rights is going to be fought.  I can bloody well guarantee you whose campaign I <em>won&#8217;t</em> be volunteering for and donating to at the next go-round.  Serve your people, serve their interests, and don&#8217;t turn millions of us into instant criminals simply because we own iPods and like to take music with us.  You, sir, are &#8211; in my opinion &#8211; no better than a weasel.</p></blockquote>
<p>Makes you wonder what ol&#8217; Jim will be doing for a living when he&#8217;s through with politics&#8230;nice cushy job with CRIA, perhaps?  And let&#8217;s not forget his partner in crime, Heritage Minister Josée Verner, who is every bit as guilty in this.</p>
<p>Anyone concerned with this further erosion of rights should visit the nerve-center of opposition to this:  <a href="http://michaelgeist.ca/">Michael Geist</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://daryldean.com/2008/06/14/our-say/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Taser Report Delayed?  Leak it!</title>
		<link>http://daryldean.com/2008/06/13/taser-delayed/</link>
		<comments>http://daryldean.com/2008/06/13/taser-delayed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 16:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daryl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daryldean.com/2008/06/13/taser-delayed/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I call upon anyone in possession of a copy of this report to leak it to the media immediately.  Do your own conscience a favour and do your country a service by releasing this report before Doris puts his stamp on it.  Please.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From CBC: <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2008/06/12/taser-report.html" target="_blank"> http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2008/06/12/taser-report.html</a></p>
<p>Okay, now it&#8217;s all gone too far.  I call shenanigans on this sorry damn excuse of a Federal Government, and I especially call out Stockwell &#8220;Doris&#8221; Day for delaying a report so that he might put some of his own spin on it before it gets released.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think there could be one single, solitary, non-bullshit reason given by any sane person to justify delaying such an anticipated report for any period of time at all&#8230;let alone for SIX DAYS.</p>
<p>Obviously, there&#8217;s something in there that very much concerns our Mr. Day.</p>
<p><strong>I call upon anyone in possession of a copy of this report to leak it to the media immediately.  Do your own conscience a favour and do your country a service by releasing this report before Doris puts his stamp on it.  Please.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://daryldean.com/2008/06/13/taser-delayed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Accommodation?</title>
		<link>http://daryldean.com/2008/05/28/accommodation/</link>
		<comments>http://daryldean.com/2008/05/28/accommodation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 03:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daryl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Deep Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daryldean.com/2008/05/28/accommodation/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Western law is entirely based on the premise that you may do whatever you wish, as long as it hurts no one else.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://daryldean.com/2008/05/28/accommodation/canada/" rel="attachment wp-att-64" title="Canada"><img src="http://daryldean.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/canflag.jpg" alt="Canada" align="left" border="0" /></a>Western law is entirely based on the premise that you may do whatever you wish, as long as it hurts no one else.</p>
<p>For all the volumes of laws and charters and everything else we have that defines what we are and are not allowed to do, that basic tenet rings true.</p>
<p>I love Canada.  We don&#8217;t have the economic or industrial power of many countries, and we certainly don&#8217;t have the largest population or even the largest land mass.  Canada doesn&#8217;t come first on very many lists of any consequence&#8230;though I&#8217;m not sure how many of those lists would be written by Canadians.   <span id="more-63"></span></p>
<p>We&#8217;re currently #4 on the UN&#8217;s <a href="http://hdrstats.undp.org/countries/country_fact_sheets/cty_fs_CAN.html" target="_blank">Human Development Index</a>, which we&#8217;ve been #1 on before.  There&#8217;s not much to separate the top countries in the current list, and coming in behind only Iceland, Norway and Australia &#8211; all beautiful (and smaller) countries &#8211; puts us in pretty good company.  Canada is a wonderful country to live in, and I&#8217;m very proud to call it my home.  Six or seven years ago I would have said I was Patriotic, but that seems to have taken on a different meaning lately.  We Canucks are a bit understated about that anyway.</p>
<p>Having been born Canadian, I am entitled to all that this wonderful country has to offer.  Being free, I can choose to live wherever I wish and whom I wish to live with.  I can work for any employer that will have me, and I can earn as much money as they are willing to pay me for my services.  I can speak my mind about whatever I wish without fear of repercussion because Canada is a free nation and those are our values.  I might not agree with what someone else might be saying, but as long as they aren&#8217;t inciting violence or telling outright lies then it is their right to say it.</p>
<p>These are the values shared by most of the West.  Freedom of speech, freedom of association, freedom of assembly, freedom of the press &#8230; the list goes on.  We are free, and we take our freedom very seriously.</p>
<p>My point here is that freedom is my birthright.  I enjoy and treasure my freedom as those before me enjoyed theirs, and I have the most profound respect for those that have served our nation to secure it.  Our freedom has been forged in steel and in blood, and it is incumbent upon all of us to maintain these freedoms for the benefit of everyone.  I have never lived in a country that was not Free.   I have visited places that were not.  I&#8217;ll take Freedom.</p>
<p>One freedom that we&#8217;re starting to have clashes about is Freedom of Religion. As a Canadian, you are free to practise whatever religion you wish. And I, if I wish, am entirely free to ridicule you for your choice if I don&#8217;t like it.<sup>(1)</sup></p>
<p>Anyone coming to Canada must be made to understand that we are Free, and that being Free means that you <em>will</em> be offended&#8230;either by someone meaning to offend you or someone with the very best of intentions.  I can&#8217;t remember how many times I&#8217;ve been offended by something or other, and that&#8217;s just life the way we know it.</p>
<p>I would never deny someone the right to speak freely regardless of how I feel about the topic being discussed.  All I ask is that my viewpoint also be heard.  That&#8217;s all, and that&#8217;s about all the accommodation I think any of us needs.</p>
<blockquote><p>1. Not that I generally ridicule anything other than Scientology and Heaven&#8217;s Gate.  I&#8217;m just making a point.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://daryldean.com/2008/05/28/accommodation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hillary, Give it Up Already</title>
		<link>http://daryldean.com/2008/05/23/hillary_quit/</link>
		<comments>http://daryldean.com/2008/05/23/hillary_quit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 04:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daryl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Deep Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daryldean.com/2008/05/23/hillary_quit/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I'd just like to thank you for running such a good campaign for the Democratic Nomination, at least up until a while back when you started talking about white people liking you more and blowing Iran off the map. Not that I necessarily disagree that there will come a time when Iran needs the rubber-hose treatment, but this isn't the sort of thing a potential President should be saying.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Hillary,</p>
<p>I&#8217;d just like to thank you for running such a good campaign for the Democratic Nomination, at least up until a while back when you started talking about white people liking you more and blowing Iran off the map.  <a href="http://daryldean.com/2006/12/08/lake-of-fire-anyone/" target="_blank">Not that I necessarily disagree</a> that there will come a time when Iran needs the rubber-hose treatment, but this isn&#8217;t the sort of thing a potential President should be saying.</p>
<p><span id="more-62"></span>A potential President shouldn&#8217;t be saying anything that absolutely anyone would like to hear.  Sure, it&#8217;s nice to propose a gas tax holiday&#8230;but does anyone <em>really <strong>believe</strong></em> that gas would actually be any cheaper during this period?  If you make the oil companies pay the tax, where oh where do you think they will get the money to do that?  It&#8217;s a really really stupid idea.  And it&#8217;s beneath you.</p>
<p>A potential President shouldn&#8217;t be going on TV saying that they don&#8217;t agree with &#8220;elitists&#8221; and the elite of society, and that you think you&#8217;re not elite.  If you&#8217;re not elite, why in blue blazes do you think you should be President?  We&#8217;ve all seen in the last eight years what you get when you put an uneducated, privileged boob in the White House &#8211; does anyone really want another President that doesn&#8217;t know his or her head from their ass?  The President <em>should</em> be elite.  The President <em>should</em> know more than the rest of us.  And, as a highly-educated, privileged, talented woman, you should know better.</p>
<p>But now you&#8217;re doing damage to the party you hold dear.  By staying in the race when attention has already shifted from you to Obama vs. McCain, and stubbornly hanging on, you detract from the very message you have espoused for so long.  If you did somehow manage to secure the nomination after all that has happened, I would bet that McCain would be the next President.  All the things you&#8217;ve said from State to State to pander to their local interests would be shown to clash, and you would be painted as indecisive and insincere.  At least Obama has stuck to his guns and stayed on-message since the beginning.  It&#8217;s why he&#8217;s beaten you.</p>
<p>In the coming days your campaign will hit harder on the supposed sexism against you and, perhaps, also notch up the black/white rhetoric just a little bit more.  And these will be sad days.</p>
<p>I think we all know how much you want to be President.  Well, how about Secretary of State?  Give it up now and try again the next time around.  Maybe a stint as Secretary-General of the UN would do you some good.  If you keep going there will be no room for you in an Obama Government.</p>
<p>Maybe America isn&#8217;t ready for a woman to be President.  Maybe it is.  We won&#8217;t know for a while, because people have already decided that <em>you</em> are not going to be the President.  And it likely has very little to do with your being female.  Until recently, I believe people had a great deal of respect for you &#8211; even your opponents.</p>
<p>So get out while you still can.  Get out while you still have at least a shred of dignity left.  Get out and hold your head high in knowing that you&#8217;ve gotten farther into the contest than most people could ever dream.  And know that you&#8217;re the first woman to ever actually win a single primary, let alone as many as you have.  For a while it looked like you&#8217;d make it, and in doing that I think you broke the glass ceiling just  by hitting up against it, as no woman before you had ever done.</p>
<p>Congratulations, and condolences,<br />
Daryl Dean</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://daryldean.com/2008/05/23/hillary_quit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Olympic Boycott</title>
		<link>http://daryldean.com/2008/03/28/boycott-beijing/</link>
		<comments>http://daryldean.com/2008/03/28/boycott-beijing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 15:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daryl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Deep Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daryldean.com/2008/03/28/boycott-beijing/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nobody seems to be saying this outright yet, so I&#8217;ll say it for all of us that are thinking it: Let&#8217;s boycott the Beijing Olympics. I know that it would be a huge disappointment for all those athletes that are training so hard in order to compete at the highest level. And I know that, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nobody seems to be saying this outright yet, so I&#8217;ll say it for all of us that are thinking it:</p>
<p><span id="more-60"></span></p>
<h3>Let&#8217;s boycott the Beijing Olympics.</h3>
<p>I know that it would be a huge disappointment for all those athletes that are training so hard in order to compete at the highest level.  And I know that, in most cases, people devote their lives to the pursuit of their sport.  And I certainly know how enjoyable it is to watch these people perform at the very limit of human capability.  But I can wait another 4 years, and I would hope that those athletes that could not do the same would at least understand that we are doing this for a higher purpose.</p>
<p>The Olympics is a feel-good endeavour for the planet, so let&#8217;s not contribute to the glory of a nation that sees fit to trample its own people&#8217;s rights beneath the boots of their soldiers.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve seen <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiananmen_Square_protests_of_1989">Tiananmen Square</a>, we know about <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forced_abortions">forced abortion</a>, and we know about <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reeducation_through_labor">reeducation through labor</a>.  And there&#8217;s lots, lots more.</p>
<p>We also know that Tibet is currently going through mass unrest and that scores of people have been killed for what we in the West would merely consider to be their opinion.  And I believe that any reasonable persons among us would want it stopped immediately.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.olympic.org/uk/index_uk.asp">IOC</a> should never have awarded an Olympics to a nation with such a poor track record of treatment of its&#8217; own people.  None of us should seek to bring international prestige to China, and by boycotting their Olympics we can serve them a strong rebuke that they could not possibly sweep under the rug.</p>
<p><img src="http://daryldean.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/canada_flag.gif" alt="Canadian Flag" /> So I say that Canada, as a defender of <a href="http://www.pch.gc.ca/progs/pdp-hrp/docs/declare_e.cfm">Basic Human Rights</a>, should boycott the Beijing Olympics and urge other nations to do the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://daryldean.com/2008/03/28/boycott-beijing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What I Would Do With 1.6 Trillion Dollars</title>
		<link>http://daryldean.com/2008/03/15/1point6trillion/</link>
		<comments>http://daryldean.com/2008/03/15/1point6trillion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 20:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daryl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Deep Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senseless Rants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daryldean.com/2008/03/15/1point6trillion/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So the USA is up to $1.6 TRILLION dollars for the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. And that&#8217;s just the dollars that have been spent, to say nothing of the human toll that these wars have exacted &#8211; on all sides. And though we may mourn more deeply for those we have lost to this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the USA is up to $1.6 <strong>TRILLION</strong> dollars for the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.  And that&#8217;s just the dollars that have been spent, to say nothing of the human toll that these wars have exacted &#8211; on all sides.  And though we may mourn more deeply for those we have lost to this fight, we cannot forget the innocent lives that have needlessly been lost.</p>
<p>The object of fighting any War is to gain security.  In this regard, I did and still do believe that we have done the right thing in Afghanistan.  The right thing is not always the easy thing, but to deprive Al-Qaeda of their Taliban protectors and to attempt to return Afghanistan to the community of nations is a noble effort.  We harbour no doubts that Afghanistan was the staging ground for numerous attacks, including those of September 11, 2001.</p>
<p>I also believe that the USA had to hit back after those attacks.  To sit idle or to engage in protracted diplomacy would have sent the wrong message to those who would wish harm to the USA and its allies.</p>
<p>But Iraq, well, that&#8217;s an entirely different kettle of fish.<br />
<span id="more-54"></span><br />
When I saw Colin Powell, a man for whom I had nothing but the greatest of respect, give his speech at the UN Security Council on the eve of the Iraq War, I was in awe.  Not only was the man whom many would consider one of the USA&#8217;s foremost statesmen of the day putting himself in the spotlight to relay to us what the American Administration knew about Saddam Hussein and Iraq, but over his right shoulder sat George Tenet &#8211; then director of the CIA.  Well, I thought, if he&#8217;s got Tenet sitting behind him &#8211; by extension, putting his own reputation on the line &#8211; then that must mean that the very best intelligence available has been brought to bear on this.  And they <em>must</em> be telling the truth.</p>
<p>A few short years later, we know that the evidence that Powell presented was entirely fabricated.  Why, we&#8217;re not sure, but Saddam did try to kill Dubya&#8217;s daddy and Rumsfeld, Cheney, Wolfowitz, et. al. wanted to finish the job that Bush Senior did not.  I refuse to believe that a man of Powell&#8217;s unimpeachable reputation knew that he was being hoodwinked, and I believe it had a lot to do with his departure from the State Department.</p>
<p>But, pulling back from the whys and hows, let&#8217;s focus on what the United States might have been done with this <strong>$1,600,000,000,000.00</strong> &#8230;other than going to War.</p>
<h3>Dependence on Oil</h3>
<p>Let&#8217;s see.  I remember reading something &#8211; perhaps in Scientific American or Wired &#8211; that said it would take roughly $100 Billion of government investment over 10 years to develop the remaining bits and pieces that are holding back widespread adoption of Hydrogen as a fuel for vehicles.  Things like more efficient ways to make it, and especially a safer storage tank to put into cars to hold the stuff.  There is no doubt that these things are within the technology that we have now or could develop if given enough resources (money) to pursue them.</p>
<p>Imagine that we didn&#8217;t care about Oil any more.  Just imagine what it would be like to live in a World where North America stood at the cutting edge of the Hydrogen Millennium.  We wouldn&#8217;t have to worry about emissions targets any longer, and the export of technology to other countries wanting to catch up would reap <em>trillions</em> in trade.  Certainly we would all benefit.</p>
<p>So, $100,000,000,000.00 later, we have a Hydrogen Economy and we&#8217;re all non-polluting.  Sheer genius, and all for 1/16th the cost of the wars up to now.</p>
<p>Now what do we do with the other $1,500,000,000,000.00?  A lot, to be sure.</p>
<h3>Cure the Sick</h3>
<p>How about we throw $100 Billion at Cancer research and another $100 Billion at AIDS?  If it&#8217;s enough money to convert us all to Hydrogen, it must be able to do some good against these killers.  Of course, the cleaner air we&#8217;d all have from the Hydrogen power might well get us a head start, but I would think that if $200,000,000,000.00 couldn&#8217;t cure AIDS or Cancer it would surely give us a very great number of advances and other things we could use.</p>
<p>So now we&#8217;re down to $1,300,000,000,000.00.  That money sure goes fast when you&#8217;re doing good work.  Think how many guns, trucks and tanks didn&#8217;t get made while we were making the World a better place for everyone.</p>
<p>Speaking of which&#8230;</p>
<h3>Making the World a Better Place</h3>
<p>I think that if the World is ever going to really be a better place we need to better educate the people that inhabit it.  And that means seriously reaching out to developing nations and giving &#8211; yep, giving &#8211; them what they need to educate their children.</p>
<p>A good start to that might be the <a href="http://laptop.org/">OLPC project</a>.  Negroponte&#8217;s done an amazing thing here: He&#8217;s given the World the ability to put a computer in the hands of every kid on the planet.  The only thing that holds it back is the cost.</p>
<p>So let&#8217;s order a Billion of them.  If the project is ever to reach that $100.00 per unit cost that was originally touted, it will be when we&#8217;re building a <em>billion</em> of &#8216;em.  So the straight-up cost would be $100,000,000,000.00 for the laptops.  Let&#8217;s double that to allow for bribing all the politicians and dictators in the World that don&#8217;t want this for their people, and then let&#8217;s triple it to allow for distribution, repairs and contingency.</p>
<p>So that&#8217;s $300,000,000,000.00.  Not a small amount, but can you really put a value on educating the entire planet?</p>
<p>And we&#8217;re down to an even $1,000,000,000,000.00.  That&#8217;s a nice round number, isn&#8217;t it?  And in the process we&#8217;ve developed a Hydrogen Economy, very likely cured AIDS, Cancer and who knows what else, and we&#8217;ve given every kid on the planet a computer with which to propel themselves from poverty and enrich themselves, their families, and their nations.</p>
<p>And to think we could have been killing people the whole time!</p>
<h3>Conquer World Hunger</h3>
<p>There will be people out there that will say that spending 300 billion dollars on computers is the wrong thing to do in a World that&#8217;s so hungry.  Well, I&#8217;m not going to get into the whole &#8220;There is enough food for everyone&#8221; argument, so let&#8217;s just toss another 300 billion at that.</p>
<p>Not all the billion kids we&#8217;d give laptops to are going hungry to begin with, and 300 billion would feed (<a href="http://christianchildrensfund.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/christianchildrensfund.cfg/php/enduser/std_adp.php?p_faqid=89&#038;p_created=1125507533&#038;p_sid=7w4UX5Xi&#038;p_lva=&#038;p_sp=cF9zcmNoPSZwX3NvcnRfYnk9JnBfZ3JpZHNvcnQ9JnBfcm93X2NudD0zNCZwX3Byb2RzPSZwX2NhdHM9JnBfcHY9JnBfY3Y9JnBfcGFnZT0x&#038;p_li=&#038;p_topview=1">at $24 per month</a>) 1,041,666,666 kids for a year.  Or 520,833,333 kids for 2 years, or 260,416,666 kids for three years, and so forth.  However you slice it, it would feed a lot of kids for a long time.</p>
<p>So now we&#8217;re down to $700 billion dollars.  I&#8217;m starting to feel a little poor, aren&#8217;t you?</p>
<h3>Really Make the World Safer</h3>
<p>Let&#8217;s pick the top 10 most distressed countries on the face of the Earth and offer $100 for every firearm turned in.  Let&#8217;s spend 10 billion per country, meaning about $7.5 billion for buyback and $2.5 billion for administration, bribes and destruction.  For $100 billion dollars we could rid the World of 750,000,000 guns.</p>
<p>I think that ought to be a lot of them, and we&#8217;re still left with 600 billion dollars.</p>
<p><em>So let&#8217;s get a little crazy!</em></p>
<h3>Fusion Power</h3>
<p>For all this Hydrogen fuel and everything else, we need massive sources of safe, cheap power.  And fusion is the way.</p>
<p>Unlike Nuclear Fission, which all current power-producing reactors use, Nuclear Fusion does not produce harmful wastes.  The problem with Fusion is the immense amounts of power that are needed just to start the process and contain it.  Another problem is the fantastic amount of money that a real power-producing fusion reactor is going to cost to build.</p>
<p>The current pinnacle of fusion research is <a href="http://www.iter.org/">ITER</a>.  It&#8217;s supposed to cost about $7.6 billion to build and operate, and I think we should put $200 billion toward building two full-size reactors once we learn our lessons from ITER.</p>
<p>And that puts us down to $400 billion.</p>
<p>Finally&#8230;</p>
<h3>Climate Remediation</h3>
<p>We&#8217;ve messed up the planet pretty badly.  We&#8217;ve pumped trillions of tons of CO2 back into the atmosphere that <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaia_hypothesis">Gaia</a> herself took hundreds of billions of years to sequester, and we&#8217;ve done it all in less than a couple of hundred years.</p>
<p>There are some very smart people out there that have come up with methods of atmospheric CO2 capture.  I say we give them what money we have left and see how far it takes us toward cleaning up our own mess.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t really think $400 billion will be enough to do the whole job, but it should at least get the ball rolling in a major way.  Perhaps these programs could be sustained through taxes on countries and companies that still emit CO2, but that&#8217;s a political decision&#8230;and I&#8217;m not a politician.</p>
<h3>Let me know what you think</h3>
<p>What would you do differently?  Have I missed something obvious?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://daryldean.com/2008/03/15/1point6trillion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Just Say No to Pennies</title>
		<link>http://daryldean.com/2008/01/09/no_to_pennies/</link>
		<comments>http://daryldean.com/2008/01/09/no_to_pennies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 07:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daryl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Deep Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senseless Rants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daryldean.com/2008/01/09/no_to_pennies/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently there was a study released that 55% of Canadians want to keep the penny. Well, as one of that other 45%, I intend to vote with my pocket &#8211; my considerably lighter pocket &#8211; by not taking pennies any more. That&#8217;s right. When I pay with cash, if my change is $1.59, I won&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently there was a study released that 55% of Canadians want to keep the penny.  Well, as one of that other 45%, I intend to vote with my pocket &#8211; my considerably lighter pocket &#8211; by not taking pennies any more.</p>
<p><img src='http://daryldean.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/penny.gif' alt='A useless penny' /></p>
<p>That&#8217;s right.  When I pay with cash, if my change is $1.59, I won&#8217;t take the four or nine pennies that will be foisted upon me.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not like the &#8220;Take-a-Penny, Leave-a-Penny&#8221; tray you see in a lot of places, where you take your pennies and toss them in there.  No, this is a more powerful statement than that, it&#8217;s &#8220;I say No to Pennies.&#8221;</p>
<p>So, say no to pennies.  You can have a whole pocket full of the things and still not be able to buy a stick of gum, so let&#8217;s just ditch the things and move on with our lives.  The more of us that don&#8217;t want pennies, the less pennies will be needed, and the less it will cost us all anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://daryldean.com/2008/01/09/no_to_pennies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
